NanoMask™ - 50 Pack
NanoMask™ - 50 Pack
The Breathing Is Believing NanoMask™ from Prescientx takes comfort, fit and protection to the next level by combining advanced materials, design, and manufacturing.
- Advanced nanofiber filtration
- Latex-free 3-ply construction
- Hydrophobic inner and outer layer
- Adjustable ear loops made of latex free fabric
- ASTM L3 material
Imagine a mask that:
- breathes like it's not even there
- forms to your face
- seals without effort
- stays cool and comfortable all day
- doesn't fog up glasses or goggles
- is designed to be reused
How do you clean your mask? Warm soapy water to remove oils and dust from the elastomeric seal.
How long will your NanoMask™ last? Depends on use, handling and care. Typical daily 8h use - >1 month. Typical occasional use - up to 6 months.
Aranet4 takes CO2 monitoring to the next level of portability, usability, and utility.
Understand your risk. Take it everywhere: home, school, gym, office, transit, air travel.
The lower the CO2, the less risk of exposure to rebreathed air.
Aranet4 shows CO₂ measurements directly on its e-ink screen with a corresponding color indicator and configurable sound alarms.
Aranet4 uses the most precise Nondispersive infrared (NDIR) sensor technology for accurate CO₂ measurements. It has a super-efficient e-ink display that extends its battery life up to 2 years (2xAA).
Aranet4 device is Bluetooth compatible, using your iOS or Android device.
Outdoor air is ~420 ppm CO2. Unoccupied indoor spaces may be higher due to combustion sources such as gas appliances, candles and fireplaces.
For occupied spaces, each increase of 400ppm above unoccupied = 1% rebreathed air.
Cognitive function impairment increases above 1000ppm and is pronounced over 1400 ppm.1
1 Allen, Joseph G., Piers MacNaughton, Usha Satish, Suresh Santanam, Jose Vallarino, and John D. Spengler. 2015. “Associations of Cognitive Function Scores with Carbon Dioxide, Ventilation, and Volatile Organic Compound Exposures in Office Workers: A Controlled Exposure Study of Green and Conventional Office Environments.” Environmental Health Perspectives 124 (6): 805-812. doi:10.1289/ehp.1510037.